The First Results Are In: Crimson Vow Tournament Decklists and Results

This weekend was the first since the release of the latest MTG set Innistrad: Crimson Vow, and that means we now have access to the first Standard tournament results in the newly revitalized format!

Since the set released on Thursday, we’ve seen a number of existing decks in the format receiving upgrades along with a handful of new archetypes striving to gain a foothold. With the first few competitive tournaments now in the books, we can see how the format is beginning to take shape and what archetypes are finding the most success early on.

Three notable Standard tournaments took place this weekend: a two-day event hosted by well-known MTGA streamer Crokeyz and his team, sporting a grand prize of 10,000 gems and over 400 players; the continuation of the Red Bull Untapped 2021 series, the International Stop IV, with cash prizes and an impressive player count of over 1,000; and the smaller Hooglandia Open, put on by streamer Jeff Hoogland and sponsored with store credit prizes to CoolStuffInc.

With 1,500 players in total going head to head against each other and prizes on the line, there’s a lot we can learn about the new format – so let’s get to it! We’ll start off with a quick discussion of how the meta is looking across the three tournaments. Then, we’ll present metagame tables for each event along with the final results and decklists from the Top 8s. You can use the quick links below to navigate quickly:

For even more decklists in the post-Crimson Vow Standard format, be sure to check out our full catalog of decks from day one and day two:


Crimson Vow Week 1 Tournament Metagame

standard
16 Sep 2021 - 02 Dec 2021
scroll right
Powered by
win
rate
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
izzet dragons ️
vs
temur aggro
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
grixis turns
vs
azorius control
vs
izzet control
vs
gruul werewolves
vs
mono-black control
vs
sultai midrange
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
selesnya ramp
mono-green aggro
18.47% metagame
6699 matches
global 54.0% [52.8%-55.2%]
-
58.9%
1289 matches
39.9%
1204 matches
61.3%
746 matches
52.5%
375 matches
55.9%
213 matches
51.4%
222 matches
54.2%
295 matches
62.8%
199 matches
56.7%
104 matches
65.9%
132 matches
50.0%
146 matches
46.2%
132 matches
43.5%
92 matches
45.8%
83 matches
mono-green aggro
18.47% metagame
6699 matches
global 54.0% [52.8%-55.2%]
izzet turns
13.47% metagame
5035 matches
global 51.5% [50.1%-52.9%]
41.1%
1289 matches
-
49.4%
802 matches
55.6%
538 matches
43.6%
243 matches
65.1%
186 matches
44.5%
164 matches
62.1%
169 matches
61.7%
141 matches
40.5%
74 matches
37.1%
97 matches
72.0%
93 matches
51.6%
93 matches
66.1%
56 matches
67.3%
49 matches
izzet turns
13.47% metagame
5035 matches
global 51.5% [50.1%-52.9%]
mono-white aggro
13.36% metagame
5203 matches
global 54.6% [53.2%-56%]
60.1%
1204 matches
50.6%
802 matches
-
51.1%
548 matches
53.2%
252 matches
58.9%
168 matches
48.5%
229 matches
48.1%
160 matches
54.8%
124 matches
49.1%
228 matches
52.2%
69 matches
52.9%
85 matches
55.9%
68 matches
34.7%
95 matches
47.8%
46 matches
mono-white aggro
13.36% metagame
5203 matches
global 54.6% [53.2%-56%]
izzet dragons ️
8.48% metagame
3406 matches
global 47.9% [46.2%-49.6%]
38.7%
746 matches
44.4%
538 matches
48.9%
548 matches
-
49.0%
208 matches
50.0%
88 matches
33.3%
102 matches
49.1%
106 matches
45.2%
73 matches
49.0%
49 matches
47.1%
70 matches
57.1%
56 matches
56.7%
60 matches
74.2%
31 matches
52.5%
40 matches
izzet dragons ️
8.48% metagame
3406 matches
global 47.9% [46.2%-49.6%]
temur aggro
3.73% metagame
1590 matches
global 52.6% [50.1%-55%]
47.5%
375 matches
56.4%
243 matches
46.8%
252 matches
51.0%
208 matches
-
72.7%
44 matches
32.7%
49 matches
51.1%
47 matches
83.3%
30 matches
42.9%
7 matches
56.3%
16 matches
47.1%
17 matches
53.8%
26 matches
40.0%
5 matches
40.0%
15 matches
temur aggro
3.73% metagame
1590 matches
global 52.6% [50.1%-55%]
dimir control
3.42% metagame
1205 matches
global 42.8% [40.1%-45.6%]
44.1%
213 matches
34.9%
186 matches
41.1%
168 matches
50.0%
88 matches
27.3%
44 matches
-
38.7%
31 matches
25.7%
35 matches
52.0%
25 matches
40.6%
32 matches
29.6%
27 matches
46.2%
13 matches
45.5%
22 matches
26.7%
15 matches
44.4%
18 matches
dimir control
3.42% metagame
1205 matches
global 42.8% [40.1%-45.6%]
jund midrange
2.99% metagame
1276 matches
global 55.5% [52.7%-58.2%]
48.6%
222 matches
55.5%
164 matches
51.5%
229 matches
66.7%
102 matches
67.3%
49 matches
61.3%
31 matches
-
55.2%
29 matches
73.1%
26 matches
64.3%
70 matches
45.5%
11 matches
37.5%
16 matches
33.3%
18 matches
40.0%
30 matches
35.7%
14 matches
jund midrange
2.99% metagame
1276 matches
global 55.5% [52.7%-58.2%]
grixis turns
2.84% metagame
1156 matches
global 48.3% [45.4%-51.2%]
45.8%
295 matches
37.9%
169 matches
51.9%
160 matches
50.9%
106 matches
48.9%
47 matches
74.3%
35 matches
44.8%
29 matches
-
51.6%
31 matches
44.4%
18 matches
46.2%
13 matches
50.0%
20 matches
47.1%
17 matches
40.0%
20 matches
37.5%
8 matches
grixis turns
2.84% metagame
1156 matches
global 48.3% [45.4%-51.2%]
azorius control
2.35% metagame
906 matches
global 43.3% [40.1%-46.5%]
37.2%
199 matches
38.3%
141 matches
45.2%
124 matches
54.8%
73 matches
16.7%
30 matches
48.0%
25 matches
26.9%
26 matches
48.4%
31 matches
-
50.0%
12 matches
43.8%
16 matches
55.6%
18 matches
56.3%
16 matches
60.0%
10 matches
66.7%
9 matches
azorius control
2.35% metagame
906 matches
global 43.3% [40.1%-46.5%]
izzet control
2.34% metagame
916 matches
global 51.4% [48.2%-54.6%]
43.3%
104 matches
59.5%
74 matches
50.9%
228 matches
51.0%
49 matches
57.1%
7 matches
59.4%
32 matches
35.7%
70 matches
55.6%
18 matches
50.0%
12 matches
-
66.7%
9 matches
48.0%
25 matches
30.0%
10 matches
65.6%
61 matches
25.0%
4 matches
izzet control
2.34% metagame
916 matches
global 51.4% [48.2%-54.6%]
gruul werewolves
1.68% metagame
691 matches
global 48.9% [45.2%-52.6%]
34.1%
132 matches
62.9%
97 matches
47.8%
69 matches
52.9%
70 matches
43.8%
16 matches
70.4%
27 matches
54.5%
11 matches
53.8%
13 matches
56.3%
16 matches
33.3%
9 matches
-
33.3%
15 matches
30.0%
10 matches
44.4%
9 matches
50.0%
18 matches
gruul werewolves
1.68% metagame
691 matches
global 48.9% [45.2%-52.6%]
mono-black control
1.60% metagame
697 matches
global 46.6% [43%-50.3%]
50.0%
146 matches
28.0%
93 matches
47.1%
85 matches
42.9%
56 matches
52.9%
17 matches
53.8%
13 matches
62.5%
16 matches
50.0%
20 matches
44.4%
18 matches
52.0%
25 matches
66.7%
15 matches
-
33.3%
12 matches
40.0%
10 matches
68.8%
16 matches
mono-black control
1.60% metagame
697 matches
global 46.6% [43%-50.3%]
sultai midrange
1.36% metagame
622 matches
global 50.2% [46.2%-54.1%]
53.8%
132 matches
48.4%
93 matches
44.1%
68 matches
43.3%
60 matches
46.2%
26 matches
54.5%
22 matches
66.7%
18 matches
52.9%
17 matches
43.8%
16 matches
70.0%
10 matches
70.0%
10 matches
66.7%
12 matches
-
60.0%
5 matches
62.5%
8 matches
sultai midrange
1.36% metagame
622 matches
global 50.2% [46.2%-54.1%]
orzhov midrange
1.25% metagame
590 matches
global 53.1% [49%-57%]
56.5%
92 matches
33.9%
56 matches
65.3%
95 matches
25.8%
31 matches
60.0%
5 matches
73.3%
15 matches
60.0%
30 matches
60.0%
20 matches
40.0%
10 matches
34.4%
61 matches
55.6%
9 matches
60.0%
10 matches
40.0%
5 matches
-
28.6%
7 matches
orzhov midrange
1.25% metagame
590 matches
global 53.1% [49%-57%]
selesnya ramp
0.99% metagame
449 matches
global 51.7% [47.1%-56.3%]
54.2%
83 matches
32.7%
49 matches
52.2%
46 matches
47.5%
40 matches
60.0%
15 matches
55.6%
18 matches
64.3%
14 matches
62.5%
8 matches
33.3%
9 matches
75.0%
4 matches
50.0%
18 matches
31.3%
16 matches
37.5%
8 matches
71.4%
7 matches
-
selesnya ramp
0.99% metagame
449 matches
global 51.7% [47.1%-56.3%]
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
izzet dragons ️
vs
temur aggro
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
grixis turns
vs
azorius control
vs
izzet control
vs
gruul werewolves
vs
mono-black control
vs
sultai midrange
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
selesnya ramp

If there’s one thing that’s clear from the first week of results, it’s that Mono Green Aggro and Mono White Aggro are here to stay. In both of the larger tournaments, Mono White and Mono Green were the #1 and #2 most popular archetypes in the field.

mono-white aggro
54.6% global win rate
13.36% metagame share
Powered by
best against
vs mardu midrange
100.0% win rate
7 tracked matches
vs jund control
100.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs selesnya blink
100.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
worst against
vs orzhov midrange
34.7% win rate
95 tracked matches
vs naya werewolves
33.3% win rate
6 tracked matches
vs mardu fury
33.3% win rate
15 tracked matches
mono-green aggro
54% global win rate
18.47% metagame share
Powered by
best against
vs boros burn
100.0% win rate
8 tracked matches
vs rakdos treasures
100.0% win rate
11 tracked matches
vs golgari ramp
100.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
worst against
vs mono-black zombies
37.5% win rate
8 tracked matches
vs mardu midrange
33.3% win rate
6 tracked matches
vs boros humans
28.6% win rate
7 tracked matches

These two aggressive mono-colored archetypes were already major players in Standard before Crimson Vow, and the set has brought some new tools for them both.

Mono Green, which often didn’t run any one-drops before Vow, received Ascendant Packleader to help fill the early curve. In addition, Ulvenwald Oddity has been showing up in many stompy decks as a hasty mid-late-game threat that makes the deck even more resistant to sweepers.

Meanwhile, Mono White decks, which were already heavy on disruption thanks to cards like Elite Spellbinder and Skyclave Apparition, got what may be the most powerful card in the set: Thalia, Guardian of Thraben.

We can also see Selesnya Humans decks, which typically have a lot of cards in common with the Mono White lists, making up a small percentage of the field but overperforming and finding plenty of representation in the Top8s. The Humans decks are still quite low to the ground and are running the new Hopeful Initiate and Hamlet Vanguard in addition to Thalia and the other great Humans from Mono-W.

Izzet Epiphany, on the other hand, is still showing up in the meta but caused a buzz on social media when not a single one of the registered Izzet decks made it to day two of the Crokeyz tournament. The deck fared a bit better in the Red Bull Untapped International Stop IV, but it may be possible that the aggressive decks could push Izzet down at least for now.

izzet turns
51.5% global win rate
13.47% metagame share
Powered by
best against
vs mono-white humans
100.0% win rate
5 tracked matches
vs sultai control
87.5% win rate
8 tracked matches
vs orzhov control
86.7% win rate
15 tracked matches
worst against
vs gruul werewolves
37.1% win rate
97 tracked matches
vs mardu fury
28.6% win rate
7 tracked matches
vs simic aggro
25.0% win rate
20 tracked matches

Other control decks that lean more heavily on creature-based interaction, however, did relatively well. The Crokeyz tournament was taken down by Felipe Landim piloting an Orzhov Control deck similar to those that were popular in the Standard 2022 format. At the International Stop IV, a Dimir Control deck piloted by Lukas Dusek managed to finish fourth.

Another point of interest are the Vampire and Zombie tribes, which both got a decent boost thanks to Crimson Vow. Rakdos Vampires were popular enough to show up in the top archetypes of all three tournaments, but performed unremarkably with near .500 winrates and no representation in the Top 8s.

Conversely, a couple of Zombie decks did earn Top 8 finishes this weekend despite making up a relatively insignificant portion of the meta.

rakdos vampires
48.3% global win rate
0.89% metagame share
Powered by
best against
vs gruul werewolves
66.7% win rate
6 tracked matches
vs mono-white aggro
61.0% win rate
59 tracked matches
vs izzet control
58.3% win rate
24 tracked matches
worst against
vs mono-green aggro
39.1% win rate
46 tracked matches
vs jund midrange
33.3% win rate
18 tracked matches
vs dimir control
25.0% win rate
12 tracked matches
mono-black zombies
48% global win rate
0.21% metagame share
Powered by
best against
vs mono-green aggro
62.5% win rate
8 tracked matches
vs izzet turns
62.5% win rate
8 tracked matches
vs izzet control
50.0% win rate
8 tracked matches
worst against
vs mono-white aggro
46.7% win rate
15 tracked matches

The metagame at the Hooglandia Open was a bit more varied than the two larger events, as innovative deckbuilding has often been incentivized by the series’ organizers. If you’re looking for some decks that are different from the usual archetypes, we highly encourage you to check out the Top 8 lists from the Hooglandia tournament at the bottom of the page.

We have a more in-depth analysis of the developing Crimson Vow Standard metagame in our Metagame Analysis on MTG Meta here:


Crokeyz Crimson Vow Tournament

crokeyz crimson vow tournament
13 November, 2021 - standard - 356 players
scroll right
Powered by
win
rate
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
izzet dragons ️
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
rakdos vampires
vs
selesnya humans
global 60.0% [49.7%-69.5%]
-
87.5%
8 matches
13.3%
15 matches
100.0%
3 matches
33.3%
3 matches
66.7%
9 matches
70.0%
10 matches
33.3%
3 matches
global 60.0% [49.7%-69.5%]
izzet turns
40 matches
global 47.5% [32.9%-62.5%]
12.5%
8 matches
-
28.6%
7 matches
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
izzet turns
40 matches
global 47.5% [32.9%-62.5%]
mono-white aggro
107 matches
global 65.4% [56%-73.8%]
86.7%
15 matches
71.4%
7 matches
-
60.0%
5 matches
50.0%
6 matches
66.7%
3 matches
33.3%
6 matches
50.0%
6 matches
mono-white aggro
107 matches
global 65.4% [56%-73.8%]
global 36.4% [19.7%-57%]
0.0%
3 matches
50.0%
2 matches
40.0%
5 matches
-
33.3%
3 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
global 36.4% [19.7%-57%]
dimir control
33 matches
global 51.5% [35.2%-67.5%]
66.7%
3 matches
0.0%
2 matches
50.0%
6 matches
66.7%
3 matches
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
33.3%
3 matches
dimir control
33 matches
global 51.5% [35.2%-67.5%]
jund midrange
25 matches
global 56.0% [37.1%-73.3%]
33.3%
9 matches
100.0%
1 matches
33.3%
3 matches
-
-
-
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
jund midrange
25 matches
global 56.0% [37.1%-73.3%]
global 48.6% [33%-64.4%]
30.0%
10 matches
0.0%
2 matches
66.7%
6 matches
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
-
global 48.6% [33%-64.4%]
global 52.6% [31.7%-72.7%]
66.7%
3 matches
-
50.0%
6 matches
-
66.7%
3 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
-
global 52.6% [31.7%-72.7%]
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
izzet dragons ️
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
rakdos vampires
vs
selesnya humans

Metagame

ArchetypeNumber of DecksPercentage of FieldWinrate
Mono White Aggro 5515.4%63.96%
Mono Green Aggro 4512.6%61.11%
Izzet Dragons 246.7%27.27%
Dimir Control226.2%40%
Rakdos Vampires195.3%47.22%
Izzet Epiphany174.8%54.05%
Azorius Control102.8%40%
Powered by mtgmeta.io

Top 8

RankPlayerDeckRecord
1Felipe LandimOrzhov Control9-0
2António AbreuSelesnya Humans8-1
3Timo UusitaloMono White Aggro7-1
4Felix StrandtMono White Aggro 7-1
5Nathan LaumannMono Green Aggro6-1
6Jamal BaglioliMono White Aggro 6-1
7Bogdan ShapovalovSelesnya Humans6-1
8Randall NewellMono White Aggro 6-1

Decklists

[Top of Page]


Red Bull Untapped 2021 International Stop III

red bull untapped 2021 international stop iv [mountain time]
14 November, 2021 - standard - 913 players
scroll right
Powered by
win
rate
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
izzet dragons ️
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
rakdos vampires
mono-green aggro
481 matches
global 49.9% [45.4%-54.3%]
-
61.6%
73 matches
31.7%
120 matches
66.7%
30 matches
32.3%
31 matches
38.7%
31 matches
58.8%
17 matches
mono-green aggro
481 matches
global 49.9% [45.4%-54.3%]
izzet turns
453 matches
global 50.3% [45.7%-54.9%]
38.4%
73 matches
-
43.5%
131 matches
63.0%
27 matches
61.0%
41 matches
52.9%
17 matches
46.7%
15 matches
izzet turns
453 matches
global 50.3% [45.7%-54.9%]
mono-white aggro
637 matches
global 58.6% [54.7%-62.3%]
68.3%
120 matches
56.5%
131 matches
-
61.7%
60 matches
50.0%
46 matches
64.7%
34 matches
38.1%
21 matches
mono-white aggro
637 matches
global 58.6% [54.7%-62.3%]
global 42.5% [36.2%-49.1%]
33.3%
30 matches
37.0%
27 matches
38.3%
60 matches
-
9.1%
11 matches
30.8%
13 matches
75.0%
8 matches
global 42.5% [36.2%-49.1%]
dimir control
202 matches
global 54.0% [47.1%-60.7%]
67.7%
31 matches
39.0%
41 matches
50.0%
46 matches
90.9%
11 matches
-
75.0%
4 matches
75.0%
4 matches
dimir control
202 matches
global 54.0% [47.1%-60.7%]
jund midrange
143 matches
global 53.1% [45%-61.1%]
61.3%
31 matches
47.1%
17 matches
35.3%
34 matches
69.2%
13 matches
25.0%
4 matches
-
75.0%
4 matches
jund midrange
143 matches
global 53.1% [45%-61.1%]
global 52.1% [42.2%-61.8%]
41.2%
17 matches
53.3%
15 matches
61.9%
21 matches
25.0%
8 matches
25.0%
4 matches
25.0%
4 matches
-
global 52.1% [42.2%-61.8%]
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
izzet dragons ️
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
rakdos vampires

Metagame

ArchetypeNumber of DecksPercentage of FieldWinrate
Mono White Aggro18620.4%58.3%
Mono Green Aggro 14115.5%49.9%
Izzet Turns13514.8%50.4%
Dimir Control515.6%53.8%
Izzet Dragons454.9%43.6.%
Jund Midrange272.96%54.2%
Rakdos Vampires262.9%51%

Top 8

RankPlayerDeckRecord
1Rafael Quinta PozoMono White Aggro 12-0-0
2Rémi FortierIzzet Epiphany 10-1-1
3Lukas DusekDimir Control10-1-1
4Maciej SzmidtMono Black Zombies10-2-0
5Simón Arboleda EscobarMono White Aggro 10-2-0
6lighdarIzzet Epiphany 10-2-0
7Matheus Akio YanagiuraMono Green Aggro10-2-0
8Jeff PickhardtMono White Aggro 10-2-0

Decklists

[Top of Page]


Hooglandia Standard Open 11/14

hooglandia open sponsored by coolstuffinc.com & metafy.gg
14 November, 2021 - standard - 78 players
scroll right
Powered by
win
rate
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
azorius control
vs
gruul werewolves
vs
boros aggro
vs
rakdos vampires
vs
selesnya humans
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
izzet control
vs
orzhov clerics
vs
orzhov control
global 38.5% [17.7%-64.5%]
-
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
-
-
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
100.0%
1 matches
25.0%
4 matches
0.0%
1 matches
global 38.5% [17.7%-64.5%]
izzet turns
20 matches
global 75.0% [53.1%-88.8%]
0.0%
1 matches
-
100.0%
1 matches
-
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
-
100.0%
2 matches
-
izzet turns
20 matches
global 75.0% [53.1%-88.8%]
global 52.9% [31%-73.8%]
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
0.0%
2 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
100.0%
1 matches
-
75.0%
4 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
global 52.9% [31%-73.8%]
dimir control
11 matches
global 27.3% [9.7%-56.6%]
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
dimir control
11 matches
global 27.3% [9.7%-56.6%]
jund midrange
12 matches
global 25.0% [8.9%-53.2%]
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
-
0.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
-
-
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
2 matches
jund midrange
12 matches
global 25.0% [8.9%-53.2%]
global 80.0% [49%-94.3%]
-
0.0%
2 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
-
-
100.0%
2 matches
-
-
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
3 matches
-
global 80.0% [49%-94.3%]
global 63.6% [35.4%-84.8%]
-
-
-
-
100.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
global 63.6% [35.4%-84.8%]
boros aggro
12 matches
global 66.7% [39.1%-86.2%]
-
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
1 matches
-
50.0%
2 matches
-
-
-
-
-
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
boros aggro
12 matches
global 66.7% [39.1%-86.2%]
global 38.5% [17.7%-64.5%]
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
-
-
0.0%
1 matches
0.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
2 matches
-
global 38.5% [17.7%-64.5%]
global 55.6% [26.7%-81.1%]
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
-
-
100.0%
1 matches
-
-
-
-
-
global 55.6% [26.7%-81.1%]
global 60.0% [31.3%-83.2%]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
50.0%
2 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
-
50.0%
2 matches
50.0%
4 matches
-
global 60.0% [31.3%-83.2%]
izzet control
27 matches
global 48.1% [30.7%-66%]
0.0%
1 matches
-
25.0%
4 matches
-
50.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
-
0.0%
2 matches
50.0%
2 matches
-
50.0%
2 matches
-
100.0%
4 matches
-
izzet control
27 matches
global 48.1% [30.7%-66%]
orzhov clerics
31 matches
global 58.1% [40.8%-73.6%]
75.0%
4 matches
0.0%
2 matches
0.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
0.0%
3 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
1 matches
100.0%
2 matches
-
50.0%
4 matches
0.0%
4 matches
-
100.0%
2 matches
orzhov clerics
31 matches
global 58.1% [40.8%-73.6%]
orzhov control
11 matches
global 45.5% [21.3%-72%]
100.0%
1 matches
-
0.0%
1 matches
-
100.0%
2 matches
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.0%
2 matches
-
orzhov control
11 matches
global 45.5% [21.3%-72%]
vs
mono-green aggro
vs
izzet turns
vs
mono-white aggro
vs
dimir control
vs
jund midrange
vs
azorius control
vs
gruul werewolves
vs
boros aggro
vs
rakdos vampires
vs
selesnya humans
vs
orzhov midrange
vs
izzet control
vs
orzhov clerics
vs
orzhov control

Metagame

ArchetypeNumber of DecksPercentage of FieldWinrate
Izzet Dragons1114.1%50%
Orzhov Clerics78.97%58.1%
Mono White Aggro45.1%52.9%
Mono Green Aggro45.1%38.5%
Rakdos Vampires45.1%38.5%
Orzhov Control33.8%60%
Dimir Control33.8%33.33%
Jund Treasures33.8%16.67%

Top 8

RankPlayerDeckRecord
1Paul TongIzzet Epiphany 10-1
2William La HayAzorius Book9-2
3Brandon WhitleyBoros Burn7-2
4Michael MoranelliOrzhov Clerics6-2
5HedonIzzet Control6-2
6Tristan HinkleyOrzhov Clerics6-2
7CanadianEhTeamOrzhov Control5-2
8AmadiZazterDimir Zombies5-2

Decklists

[Top of Page]

Paul

Dude from Vermont who likes to play Magic and Escape from Tarkov. Musician, writer, and gamer. Submit feedback or corrections to @Paul on the Discord.